When an assessee voluntarily discloses income and the assessment is based on this disclosure without any changes, imposing a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is unjustified.
Explore the detailed analysis of ITAT Jaipur’s judgment in Sunil Chablani Vs Circle (Intl. Tax) case. Key issues include jurisdiction, assessment errors, and procedural flaws.
Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed based on estimated additions without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.
ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and implications discussed in detail.
ITAT Jaipur rules in Shobha Tomar Vs DCIT that cash deposits from professional income during demonetization cannot be deemed unexplained. Detailed analysis inside.
ITAT Jaipur rules that AO’s non-addition of bogus LTCG does not make the order automatically erroneous. Detailed analysis of Vipul Kumar Modi vs PCIT case.
ITAT Jaipur directs AO to quash Assessment Order under section 143(3) of Income Tax Act as notice to deceased assessee is deemed invalid. Detailed analysis and case precedents provided.
The Presbyterian Churc Co. Operating Credit & Thrift Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction cannot be denied without specifying how the claim of the assessee is not correctly claimed & for motioning status as AOP
Jaipur ITAT directs CIT(A) in Zila Parisad Vs ACIT to permit taxpayer to file a revised appeal memo for correction of error in mentioning assessment year in Form No. 35
ITAT Jaipur held that assessee failed to get its books of accounts audited based on a reasonable cause. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for failure to get books of account audited not leviable as assessee reasonable cause shown.
