CESTAT Kolkata held that Cenvat Credit cannot be denied alleging non-existence of seller as the Appellant being a bonafide purchaser of goods for a price which included the duty element and payment made by cheque and availed CENVAT Credit based on Cenvatable documents.
Emami Paper Mills Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT held that mere statement in the Order-In-Original dated 08.06.2016 that the appellant had suppressed material facts from the Department and that the purported contravention had been detected only during audit was insufficient justification for invoking the extended period of limitation. the evidences […]
Nurture Marketing Pvt. Ltd Vs Commr. of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) Appellant submitted that the commission in respect of volume purchase by the Second Level of distributor for the periods of 2006-07 to 2010-11 earned by the appellant is to the tune of Rs.1,22,46,991/- and the Service Tax on the same was Rs.13,94,933/- and […]
CESTAT held that in respect of utilisation of Cenvat credit there is no requirement of one to one correlation and cross utilisation of credit is permissible.
Principle of ‘user test’ also need to be considered while deciding the entitlement of assessee to avail CENVAT Credit as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Limited 2010 (255) ELT 481 (SC).
It is a settled legal position that when the assessee was not put to notice with regard to the reasons basis which the demand is being sought to be made, the proceedings cannot be legally sustained.
Aurum Pharmachem Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) Issue that has to be considered in the present appeal is whether the Appellant not having maintained separate accounts in respect of the common input services used for manufacture of dutiable final products as well as exempted goods is mandatorily required to pay […]
CESTAT Kolkata has held that Custom Broker License suspended under Regulation 16(1) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 for around a month is directed to be lifted as necessary inquiry should have completed during the said suspension time.
Service provided by a company in India to its Hundred percent holding company abroad cannot be considered as an establishment of a distinct person and therefore such services would be export of services.
CESTAT Kolkata held that Factory in terms of Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act includes any number of inputs within the same premises irrespective of the number of Central Excise registrations. Accordingly, CENVAT of such inputs available.
