Follow Us:

Bombay High Court

Reassessment cannot be based solely on reasons borrowed from other departments or reports

May 5, 2024 1974 Views 0 comment Print

In case of Balaji Mines And Minerals Pvt Ltd vs ACIT, Bombay High Court ruled that reassessment cannot be based solely on reasons borrowed from other departments or reports, such as Justice M.B. Shah Commission Report.

High Court Quashes Invalid Notice & Order: AO Lacks Jurisdiction

May 4, 2024 3486 Views 0 comment Print

In Nimir Kishore Mehta Vs ACIT, Bombay High Court invalidates notice & order under Section 148A(b), ruling AO lacked jurisdiction. Details & analysis here.

‘Transit Rent’ not liable to tax so no TDS deductible on it under Section 194I

May 4, 2024 4944 Views 0 comment Print

Explore implications of Bombay High Court’s ruling on TDS deduction under Section 194I for ‘Transit Rent’. Get insights into judgment of Sarfaraz S. Furniturewalla Vs Afshan Sharfali Ashok Kumar & Ors.

Analysis of Hexaware Technologies Limited Vs ACIT: Bombay High Court Ruling

May 4, 2024 22455 Views 0 comment Print

Hexaware Technologies Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The case of Hexaware Technologies Limited Vs ACIT, heard in the Bombay High Court, addresses significant issues surrounding reassessment proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This article delves into the key aspects of the case, the court’s findings, and their implications. Detailed Analysis: […]

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A

May 3, 2024 23991 Views 1 comment Print

Detailed analysis of Bombay High Court’s ruling on Hexaware Technologies Ltd vs ACIT. Invalid notice under Section 148 scrutinized. Time limitation, violation of CBDT Circular, faceless regime, jurisdictional conditions, change of opinion, and more explored.

No record of service of notice or order: Bombay HC set aside GST Refund rejection order

May 2, 2024 717 Views 0 comment Print

Discover the Bombay High Court’s ruling in the case of Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., where the rejection order of a refund claim was set aside due to procedural irregularities.

Section 143(1) Assessment cannot be Reopened on Mere Suspicion: Bombay HC

April 28, 2024 10368 Views 0 comment Print

Explore how the Bombay High Court ruled against reopening Section 143(1) assessments without valid reasons, safeguarding taxpayers’ rights. Detailed analysis and implications.

Arbitral Tribunal can implead non-signatories to Arbitration Agreement: Bombay HC

April 28, 2024 735 Views 0 comment Print

Bombay High Court’s ruling on Cardinal Energy vs. Subramanya Construction explores the power of Arbitral Tribunals to include non-signatories to arbitration agreements.

Income from Subsequent Development Grant: Long-Term Capital Gains, Not Other Sources

April 26, 2024 1023 Views 0 comment Print

Sunil Pran Sikand Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) In the recent case of Sunil Pran Sikand Vs ACIT before the Bombay High Court, a crucial question arose regarding the tax treatment of income derived from subsequent development grants. This case sheds light on the intricate balance between categorizing such income as long-term capital gains or […]

Negligence of tax authorities: HC Orders Income Tax Refund Credit to Petitioner

April 26, 2024 477 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the Bombay High Court’s ruling on the refund issue in Grace Associates Vs Union of India case. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031