This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Promoters’ intent to provide working capital constitutes financial debt, not operational debt: NCLAT
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajeev Kumar Jain Vs Uno Minda Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajeev Kumar Jain Vs Uno Minda Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
Introduction: In a pivotal decision, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Delhi, delineated the contours of ‘financial debt’ under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), in the case of Rajeev Kumar Jain vs Uno Minda Limited. This case sheds light on the nuanced interpretation of financial transactions that qualify as financial debts under the IBC, marking a significant moment for corporate insolvency proceedings in India.
Detailed Analysis: The appeal was lodged by Mr. R...
Author Info
