Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamal Vs Authorised Officer (DRAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Kamal Vs Authorised Officer (DRAT Chennai)

DRAT Chennai held that rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 empowers forfeiture of earnest money deposit when balance sale consideration is not paid within stipulated time. Accordingly, order confirmed and appeal is dismissed.

Facts- The appeal was filed against the sale held in respect of schedule mentioned property, on 29.05.2018. It is the case of the Appellant that Respondent No. 2 is the Partnership Firm, in which Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the partners. He mortgaged the schedule property f

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031