26-08-2010- Details of persons who had been found guilty of professional misconduct specified in the First Schedule read with Sections 21 & 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (pre-amended) and whose names as members have been removed from the Register of members of ICAI for the period mentioned against each of them in accordance with the decision of the Council of the ICAI taken under sub – section [4] of Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
| SL. NO. | NAME OF THE MEMBER/ MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NATURE/ QUANTUM OF PUNISHMENT/we.f. | LAST AVAILABLE ADDRESS |
| 1 | SURESH DHANJIBHAI CHAUHAN
(034827) |
1 YEAR REMOVAL w.e.f. 17th July, 2010 | 196D, CAVEL CROSS LANE-7, VIGAS STREET MUMBAI 400002 |
| 2 | MANOHAR SINGH SINGHATWADIA (003329) |
1 YEAR REMOVAL w.e.f. 17th July, 2010 | FLAT NO. 303, 3RD FLOOR,
SHREE SHRIYANCE BLDG, LAKHADGUNJ, NEAR KACHHI OSWAL BHAVAN, NAGPUR 440002 |
| 3 | PRAVEEN KUMAR KATYAL(082539) |
3 MONTHS REMOVALw.e.f. 17th July, 2010 |
28 PUSHPA CENTRAL MARKET, 2ND FLOOR LAJPAT NAGAR NEW DELHI 110024 |
| 4 | G MOHAN RAJU (019735) | 3 MONTHS REMOVALw.e.f. 17th July, 2010 |
NO 3 `Y’ BLOCK, 5TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR,
CHENNAI 600040 |
| 5 | S. VELAYUDHAN (024276) | 1 MONTH REMOVALw.e.f. 19th August, 2010 |
TC-39/856, Aryasalai Junction, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 036 |
| 6 | SUDESH PANDIT (073258) | 3 MONTHS REMOVALw.e.f. 19th August, 2010 |
D-10/108, Aradhana Apartments, Chitrakoot,Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur 302 021 |
| 7 | P. SUBRAMONIAN (020672) | 1 MONTH REMOVALw.e.f. 19th August, 2010 |
Meenakshi Complex, P.B. No. 37, Distt. Wayanad,
Kalpetta – 673 121 |
| 8 | VARUN CHADHA (054046) | 6 MONTHS REMOVALw.e.f. 19th August, 2010 |
Room No. 50 & 51, 2nd Floor, 3A, Chowringhee Place, Kolkata 700 013 |
The above list does not contain the cases where the members concerned have filed appeal in High Court concerned under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 against the decision of the Council taken under Section 21(4) of the said Act.
This is what we expect from the Institute, any person found guilty of the professional misconduct be punished like that. I like to request to the Institute that if somebody is informing to the Institute about the unethical practice of any member the informer name should be kept confidential. He should not be called for showing proofs of the one who is doing wrong. The Institute should find out the mistakes which were informed are they right or wrong.