Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : India reduced excise duty on petrol and diesel to offset rising global crude prices due to geopolitical tensions. The move aimed t...
Excise Duty : Health Security & National Security (HSNS) Cess Act, 2025 introduces a standalone statutory cess aimed at funding national health ...
Excise Duty : The Court upheld the Tribunal’s view that interest cannot be levied when duty paid is fully creditable to downstream units. It c...
Excise Duty : The Court held that duty-paid items supplied directly to site are not includible when the final plant is immovable. The key takeaw...
Excise Duty : Discover how the Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025 revamps tobacco taxation, introducing steep excise duties on cigarettes, che...
Excise Duty : CBI Court in Siliguri sentences former Central Excise Superintendent to four years RI and Rs. 40,000 fine in a bribery case regist...
Excise Duty : A special court imposed five years’ rigorous imprisonment and heavy fines after finding assets far beyond known income. The ruli...
Excise Duty : The FAQs confirm that cess is computed on maximum rated machine speed rather than actual production. This ensures certainty in tax...
Excise Duty : The FAQs clarify how excise duty on chewing tobacco, jarda, and gutkha will be levied based on packing machine capacity rather tha...
Excise Duty : CESTAT issues instructions for e-filing appeals, detailing registration, filing process, documents, fees, and compliance with Proc...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai held that Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules does not mandate that remanufactured goods be supplied back to the ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that works contract services used for repair and maintenance of existing plant and machinery qualify as input se...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chennai held that exports made under Notification No. 30/2004-CE and the DEPB scheme cannot be included in exempted turnove...
Excise Duty : The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued more than three years after the Department became aware of the facts was time-...
Excise Duty : CESTAT held that where the value of goods sent for job work had already been considered for credit reversal purposes, including it...
Excise Duty : The Lakshadweep Excise Regulation, 2026 establishes a comprehensive framework for licensing, manufacture, sale, transport, and con...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 25/2026 revises SAED on ATF exports to Rs 9.5 per litre with effect from 1 June 2026; domestic petrol and diesel ...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 24/2026 revises SAED rates on petrol and diesel exports from 1 June 2026, setting duty at Rs 1.5 and Rs 13.5 per ...
Excise Duty : CBIC revised SAED on ATF exports to Rs. 16 per litre effective 16 May 2026, impacting aviation fuel exporters and export duty cost...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amended the central excise notification issued in March 2026 by revising rates applicable to specified goo...
Cir. No. 35/35/94-CX Board has received the references regarding procedure to be followed in case prosecution to be launched where there is one. Adjudicating Officer for number of factories located under jurisdiction of different Collectorates.
Circular No. 34/34/94-CX I am directed to state that after the introduction of invoice-based assessment procedure, a number of representations have been received from various quarters on the implementation of the new procedure. These representations have been examined and the following instructions for guidance.
Cir. No. 32/32/94-CX I am directed to refer to Board’s instructions contained in F.No. 289/10/91-CX.9 dated 18.3.91 under which powers have been delegated to the Principal Collectors of Central Excise to grant, in individual cases, the facility of payment of Central Excise dues in upto 12 installments on merits.
I am directed to refer to Boards letter F.No. 208/61/92-CX.6, dated 04/041996, whereby the Boards Circular No. 15/90-CX. 6, dated 09/08/1990 was modified so as to enhance the monetary limit for launching prosecution from Rs. 1 lakh To Rs. 5 lakhs.
Circular No. 30/30/94-CX Instructions contained in the aforesaid letter envisage that before launching any prosecution, it is necessary that the department should have evidence to prove that the person, company or individual had guilty knowledge of the offence or had fraudulent intention to commit the offence or in any manner possessed mens-rea (mental element) which would indicate his guilt
Cir. No. 29/29/94-CX I am directed to invite your attention to the provisions of Rules 52A and 173C of Central Excise Rules, 1944, as introduced by Notification No. 4/94-CE(NT) dated 1.3.94. These provisions come into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1994.
Cir. No. 28/28/94-CX In continuation of this Department”s letter of even number dated 21.07.93 it is informed that vide sub-clause (a) of clause 63 of the Finance Bill, 1994, section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 has been imposed to be amended so as to explicitly provide that the provisions of the Central Excise Act and Rules made thereunder relating to Offences and Penalties shall be applicable in respect of this Act also.
Cir.No. 25/25/94-CX It has been brought to the Board”s notice that there is no uniformity in the crediting of the collected on account of sale of rejects and 25% of production into Domestic Tariff Area by the EPZ/100% EOUs. This has been examined and it is clarified that such duty is charged under section 3 of the Central Excise & Salt Act and therefore it should be credited under the sub-head “0038 – Union Excise Duties”.
It has been observed that in some cases, difficulty was being experienced to execute judgements delivered by various Courts in favour of the Department as banks are not prepared to honour their guarantees and pay up in terms of bank guarantees unless certified copies of the Court”s judgements are made available to them
Circular No. 24/24/94-CX Representations have been received that benefit of Notification No. 202/88- CE has been denied to the product commercially known as bright bars. In Rajkot Collectorate a view has been taken that bright bars are covered under the expression “Other bars and rods” referred at note I (m) of Chapter note to Chapter 72 and are not entitled for exemption under Notification No. 202/88-CE
