Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
CA Sandeep Kanoi

CA Sandeep Kanoi

Contributing Author
Name: CA Sandeep Kanoi Qualification: CA in Job / Business Education: B.Com / FCA Company: Taxguru Consultancy Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Articles Published: 18,853 Total Views: 116,098,239

About

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession.

Job Experience

Worked with a Mumbai Based CA Firm for 21 Years and got exposure to Direct Taxes, Indirect Taxes, Company Law, Corporate & Finance.

Job Skills

Direct Tax, Indirect Tax, Bank Finance, Company Law, Audit etc.

Articles by this Author
Corporate LawSC Clarifies Copyright vs Design for Industrial Works
Corporate Law

SC Clarifies Copyright vs Design for Industrial Works

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxSection 56(2)(viia) not apply to shares held as stock-in-trade: ITAT Mumbai
Income Tax

Section 56(2)(viia) not apply to shares held as stock-in-trade: ITAT Mumbai

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxReport & Probe Cash Transactions Exceeding ₹2 Lakh Under Section 269ST: SC
Income Tax

Report & Probe Cash Transactions Exceeding ₹2 Lakh Under Section 269ST: SC

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Corporate LawSC Clarifies NDPS Act: Overruling Judgments Apply Retroactively
Corporate Law

SC Clarifies NDPS Act: Overruling Judgments Apply Retroactively

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxCIT to Act on Merits, Not Remand Under Section 263 for Investigation Failures: SC
Income Tax

CIT to Act on Merits, Not Remand Under Section 263 for Investigation Failures: SC

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Custom DutyInteractive Flat Panels falls Under Customs Tariff Heading 8528: CAAR Mumbai
Custom Duty

Interactive Flat Panels falls Under Customs Tariff Heading 8528: CAAR Mumbai

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Custom Duty5% IGST on Marine Engines & Spares for Fishing Boats: CAAR Mumbai
Custom Duty

5% IGST on Marine Engines & Spares for Fishing Boats: CAAR Mumbai

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Corporate LawGoogle Settles Android TV Antitrust Case with CCI, Pays ₹20.24 Crore
Corporate Law

Google Settles Android TV Antitrust Case with CCI, Pays ₹20.24 Crore

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Goods and Services TaxGST notice Service through Portal Sufficient but Not Effective: Madras HC
Goods and Services Tax

GST notice Service through Portal Sufficient but Not Effective: Madras HC

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Goods and Services TaxNo adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC
Goods and Services Tax

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxCanara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable
Income Tax

Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxBombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline
Income Tax

Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxSection 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore
Income Tax

Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago
Income TaxBombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea
Income Tax

Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea

CA Sandeep Kanoi1 year ago