Allahabad High Court rules that Assessing Authorities must provide an opportunity for personal hearing before passing adverse tax assessment orders, regardless of assessee’s choice.
Learn about ITAT Kolkata’s decision in Sushama Industries vs. ITO for AY 2011-12, where a 5% disallowance is made on profit element of bogus purchases. Details here.
Read about Babusona Mondal’s appeal against the AO’s addition under Section 69B. ITAT Kolkata rules that additions can’t be made based on conjectures without considering evidence.
In a recent judgment, Kerala High Court permits a Service Tax appeal subject to the mandatory deposit, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.
Read about the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Century Plyboards I Ltd Vs C.C.-Kandla case, highlighting the denial of anti-dumping duty refund for past clearances and its implications.
In a recent judgment, Kerala High Court annuls an assessment order, citing the importance of considering the assesse’s reply before passing judgments.
Property renovation cannot be disallowed merely for the reason that no telephone number, VAT/TIN number has been mentioned in the bill and there is no charges of VAT levied in the bill
CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling on Gelatin Mass Waste generated during manufacturing, addressing the demand for CENVAT credit reversal and its sustainability.
Payments made as part of a settlement agreement regarding relinquishment of partnership interests are capital expenditures ITAT Pune in ITO Vs Sarsan Developers
In the Prompt Barter Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case, ITAT Kolkata directs AO to remove the income tax addition due to non-consideration of evidences for identity and creditworthiness of investors.
