CESTAT Kolkata has quashed the service tax demand imposed on Walchandnagar Industries Limited (WIL) in a case involving a composite contract for setting up a cement manufacturing unit. The tribunal determined that the contract primarily involved the supply of goods, and the value assigned to the bought-out items sold by WIL cannot be considered as a consulting engineer service.
Calcutta High Court quashed imposition of a 200% penalty on Bitumix India LLP for a violation related to an expired e-Way Bill. HC determined that while there was a violation, it was not grave enough to warrant such a high penalty. Instead, court directed appellants to pay a penalty of Rs. 50,000, which includes both CGST and WBGST.
An ITAT ruling in the case of Bhartiya Shiksha Prachar Samiti vs DCIT highlights the application of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and its implications for auditing requirements. Learn more about the details and impacts of this landmark case.
ITAT Cochin order for Karalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd Vs ITO. Order was set aside due to CIT(A) failing to provide reasons for decision on issues raised by assessee.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Surat has dismissed the appeal of Adarsh Sahakari Ghar Bandhnari Mandali Ltd, a co-operative housing society, confirming that expenses incurred on internet subscriptions are not eligible for deduction under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal ruled that there was no nexus between the expenses and the interest income earned by the society.
Calcutta High Court has granted a stay on initiation of reassessment proceedings beyond 6 years in case of RPC Commercial LLP. Court found that jurisdiction of assessing officer to issue notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act was barred by limitation under Section 149(1)(a)/(1)(b).
ITAT Bangalore has ruled in Bandenawaz Mulla vs. ACIT that no audit can be conducted under section 44AB of Income Tax Act when assessee has not maintained books of account.
In a case between ArcelorMittal Projects India Limited and C.C.-Mundra, the CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the appellant, stating that the limitation period for refund calculation should be determined according to Section 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act.
SEBI circular (SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-1/P/CIR/2023/123) dated July 13, 2023, regarding disclosure of material events by listed entities under Regulations 30 and 30A of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Explore the GST classification of Dhathri Dahasamani as per the recent ruling by AAR Kerala in 2024. Understand the implications and tax rates under GST Notification No. 01/2017.
