Dive deep into the amendments brought by SEBI (LODR) (Fourth Amendments) Regulations in 2022 and 2021. Uncover the intricacies, changes in regulations, and their impact. Stay informed on crucial modifications related to disclosure in financial results, submission to stock exchanges, payment of interest or dividend, and additional documentation requirements for transmission of securities.
SC held that It is duty of insurance company to communicate details of terms and conditions of insurance policy to the beneficiaries of insurance.
For the central government employees, the government was already contributing 14% of employees wages towards employee’s NPS account. Starting this FY, state government employees will receive a 14% contribution into their NPS account from their respective state governments.
As you are aware that discharge of contract by performance refers to fulfilment of the contract by performance of all the obligations in terms of the original contract, discharge by ‘accord and satisfaction’ refers to the contract being discharged by reason of performance of certain substituted obligations. The agreement by which the original obligation is […]
Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd I.T.A. No. 241 of 2011 dated 10 June 2020 Karnataka High Court Karnataka HC rules that non-compete fees paid to key employees at the time of joining is in the nature of salary income. BRIEF FACTS: In the case of Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd (Taxpayer), the issue before the HC was. […]
Mumbai Tribunal deprecates Tax Authority’s action in disallowing claim for application of income by way of donation to foreign universities approved by the CBDT.
APEX COURT in its recent decision in held that merely labelling a cheque as a security would not obviate its character as an instrument designed to meet a legally enforceable debt or liability.
BOMBAY HIGH COURT has refused ad-interim relief to stall the proposed Initial Public Offering (IPO) by the country’s oldest and largest insurer –Life Insurance Corporation of India, with a rider that any IPO before the court finally decides the challenge would be subject to the outcome of the petition.
In an action for infringement when the defendant’s trademark is identical with the plaintiff’s mark, the court will not enquire whether the infringement is such as is likely to deceive or cause confusion.
SC Held That (Motor Vehicles Act ,1988) – Third Party Insurance deemed to be transferred along with effective control over vehicle in a Hire Agreement.
