Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
CA Sayyad Sadak

CA Sayyad Sadak

Contributing Author
Name: CA Sayyad Sadak Qualification: CA in Practice Education: Chartered Accountant Company: Sayyad Sadak & Associates Location: Hyderabad, Telangana, India Articles Published: 56 Total Views: 73,656

About

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals.

Articles by this Author
Goods and Services TaxStay of Tax Demand Set Aside Because 20% Pre-Deposit Is Not Mandatory Delhi HC
Goods and Services Tax

Stay of Tax Demand Set Aside Because 20% Pre-Deposit Is Not Mandatory Delhi HC

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxAddition Deleted Because Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof in Penny-Stock Cases: ITAT Mumbai
Income Tax

Addition Deleted Because Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof in Penny-Stock Cases: ITAT Mumbai

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxDefective Sanction under Section 279(1) Vitiates Prosecution: SC
Income Tax

Defective Sanction under Section 279(1) Vitiates Prosecution: SC

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxNotional Addition on Alleged Understatement of Sales — Held Without Authority of Law
Income Tax

Notional Addition on Alleged Understatement of Sales — Held Without Authority of Law

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxMechanical Invocation of Section 263 at AO’s Behest Held Bad in Law
Income Tax

Mechanical Invocation of Section 263 at AO’s Behest Held Bad in Law

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 271D Penalty Fails Without AO Satisfaction or Pending Assessment Proceedings
Income Tax

Section 271D Penalty Fails Without AO Satisfaction or Pending Assessment Proceedings

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxIncome Tax Assessment Upheld Because Amalgamation Was Not Informed to Tax Officer
Income Tax

Income Tax Assessment Upheld Because Amalgamation Was Not Informed to Tax Officer

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 271D Penalty Quashed as Time-Barred in Absence of Assessment: ITAT Chennai
Income Tax

Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Time-Barred in Absence of Assessment: ITAT Chennai

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxEstimation of Profit Bars Further Expense Disallowance – AO Cannot Blow Hot and Cold
Income Tax

Estimation of Profit Bars Further Expense Disallowance – AO Cannot Blow Hot and Cold

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 271D Penalty Quashed Because Transaction Was Accepted as Genuine
Income Tax

Section 271D Penalty Quashed Because Transaction Was Accepted as Genuine

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 54 Deduction Allowed Despite Non-Deposit in CGAS
Income Tax

Section 54 Deduction Allowed Despite Non-Deposit in CGAS

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 220(2) Interest Invalid Without Section 156 Demand Notice: ITAT Mumbai
Income Tax

Section 220(2) Interest Invalid Without Section 156 Demand Notice: ITAT Mumbai

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 263 Quashed Because It Was Used Only for Review of a Completed Assessment
Income Tax

Section 263 Quashed Because It Was Used Only for Review of a Completed Assessment

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago
Income TaxSection 148 Notice Invalid Because Dispatch Date, Not Signature Date, Determines Issuance
Income Tax

Section 148 Notice Invalid Because Dispatch Date, Not Signature Date, Determines Issuance

CA Sayyad Sadak8 months ago