Karur Vysya Bank Ltd Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Facts- Only matter involved is income received in advance in the nature of interest income on discounting of bills against letter of credit is to be taxed on receipt basis or accrual basis. Assessee contended that there was no escapement of income. Assessee were following mercantile […]
HC are of the view that none of the above referred conditions are fulfilled in the present case. In the result, this writ application stands allowed. The order of provisional attachment of the five bank accounts of the writ applicant under Section 83 of the Act is quashed and set aside.
The issue under consideration is whether disallowance made u/s 36(1)(iii) is to be allowed when the Assessee has diverted interest bearing funds to its sister concern without charging any interest?
The issue under consideration is whether submitting additional claims before tribunal, which is not claim in return of income will be sustain in law?
Article contains Matrix for Tax Audit Requirement Under Section 44AB for A.Y.2020-21. Matrix has been prepared after considering provisions of section 44AB and 44AD for A.Y.2020-21
Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha & Anr. Vs. The State of Gujarat (Supreme Court) Facts- The Gujarat Government, on 17th April 2020, issued a notification under section 5 exempting all the factories from various provisions relating to weekly hours, daily hours, intervals for rest etc. for adult workers during the period 20th April 2020 till 19th July […]
The issue under consideration is whether the activities involved towards promotion of handloom sector is eligible for exemption under section 11 and 12 of Income Tax Act?
DLF Ltd. Vs. JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Deduction of Rs. 1.78 Billion in respect of profits derived on account of development considerations of bare shells would constitute profits and gains derived from business of developing any Special Economic Zone within the meaning of Section 80 IAB and was allowable to DLF Limited. Held: Assessee-company was […]
Revenue is right in contending that the genuinity of the transaction is hardly a matter, which should weigh in the minds of the Assessing officer while examining as to the whether the assessees had violated Section 40A(3) of the Act.
In this case, since there was a Family Settlement between the assessee and three brothers and they have acted upon Family Settlement Deed and distributed various properties among themselves and necessary rights and title are transferred in favour of each brother would show that parties have entered into genuine transaction.
