A recent CESTAT Kolkata ruling on service tax liability clarifies that works contracts with material supply are not liable for service tax before June 1, 2007.”
Supreme Court’s ruling on whether the extended limitation period for tax notices should be invoked based on the specific facts of the case.
In a case between Emtee Poly Yarn Pvt. Ltd. and C.C.E. & S.T. VAPI, CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside demand for Excise Duty, citing a nil rate on the day of clearance.
Kerala High Court’s decision in M/s. Henna Medicals case clarifies that differences between GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B shouldn’t lead to ITC denial. Analysis and implications.
Delhi High Court’s landmark decision in Indian Herbal Store case rejects retrospective application of Rule 89(4)(C) of CGST, benefiting exporters. Analysis and insights.
In a ruling by AAR Gujarat involving M/s. Tata AutoComp Systems Ltd, deductions for canteen facilities, transportation services, and notice pay are found to be GST exempt. The ruling also clarifies Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility with cost-based restrictions.
In case of Dipak Sarkar v. The State of West Bengal, Calcutta High Court dismisses writ petition, upholding GST liability on payments received after GST implementation for pre-GST work orders.
Karnataka High Court’s ruling on Prime Location Charges (PLC) and Floor Rise Charges (FRC) under KVAT Act, their exemption from tax, and implications. Learn more.
In case of Makhan Lal Sarkar vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Calcutta High Court directs Revenue Department to reevaluate denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) based on Circular No. 183.
In the case of M/s. Western Carrier India Ltd vs. State of U.P., Allahabad High Court held that goods accompanied by an E-way bill and invoice should be released under Section 129 of CGST Act. Learn more.
