Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanchan Lalwani Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kanchan Lalwani Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Bank passbook is not a “book of account”; hence cash deposits cannot attract Section 68.-Addition under Section 56(2)(x)(B) made without opportunity & DVO reference violates natural justice & is unsustainable. Assessee, an individual, filed return declaring income of ₹10.19 lakh. The case was selected for scrutiny on the ground of large cash deposits & property transactions. AO made two additions- ₹65 lakh u/s 68 as unexplained cash deposits, & ₹45.40 lakh u/s 56(2)(x)(B) as difference between stamp value & purchase cons...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031