Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanchan Lalwani Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanchan Lalwani Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Bank passbook is not a “book of account”; hence cash deposits cannot attract Section 68.-Addition under Section 56(2)(x)(B) made without opportunity & DVO reference violates natural justice & is unsustainable. Assessee, an individual, filed return declaring income of ₹10.19 lakh. The case was selected for scrutiny on the ground of large cash deposits & property transactions. AO made two additions- ₹65 lakh u/s 68 as unexplained cash deposits, & ₹45.40 lakh u/s 56(2)(x)(B) as difference between stamp value & purchase cons...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930