Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhirajlal Nathubhai Bhut Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhirajlal Nathubhai Bhut Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Appeal was filed against CIT(A), NFAC order dated 25.11.2024, which had confirmed a penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of ₹70,000 for alleged non-compliance with notices. Appeal was delayed by 230 days, but Tribunal condoned the delay, accepting Assessee’s explanation of genuine hardship. Assessee contended that the penalty proceedings were invalid since Assessee had already died, &  AO issued notices &  passed the penalty order in the deceased’s name, despite being informed of his death. Department nonetheless continued proceedings without brin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930