Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahesh Tukaram Matkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahesh Tukaram Matkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Revised Return After Getting Caught Claiming Wrong Deductions – ITAT Pune Upholds 200% Misreporting Penalty u/s 270A Assessee, an employee of Bosch Ltd., originally filed returns showing income of ₹4.52 lakh for AY 2017-18 after claiming Chapter VI-A deductions of ₹2.35 lakh. The case was reopened u/s 147, during which he filed a revised return admitting total income of ₹8.47 lakh & paid tax of ₹99,262. AO held that the revised return was filed only after detection by the Department & that the earlier claim involved excess deductio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930