Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sidharth Ratanlal Bafna (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sidharth Ratanlal Bafna (ITAT Pune) Penny Stock Gain Found Genuine, Reopening Held Invalid- ITAT Pune Upholds CIT(A)’s Relief A search was conducted on Bafna Group on 10-09-2014. For A.Y. 2015-16, assessment was originally completed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) accepting returned income. Later, based on information from the Investigation Wing, Nashik alleging bogus LTCG from penny-stock PFL Infotech Ltd., AO reopened assessment u/s 147 & disallowed exemption of ₹7.68 crore claimed u/s 10(38), further adding ₹23 lakh as alleged commission u/s 69C. AO relied heavily on statements of N...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930