Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Title 1: Demonetization Cash Addition Deleted: ITAT Accepts Audited Cash Balance for Business Deposits; Higher Tax Rate Inapplicable: ITAT Confirms Sec. 115BBE Cannot Apply to AY 2017-18 Delhi ITAT deleted ₹40.07 lakh added u/s 68 on cash deposits in the Assessee’s proprietary firms, holding that audited books showed sufficient cash balance & AO never doubted sales or purchases. However, regarding ₹7.5 lakh deposited in the personal HDFC account, Tribunal sustained ₹3.75 lakh for want of evidence. It also held that higher tax u/s 115BBE couldn...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930