This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
One-Day Notice Not Enough – ITAT Remands Section 271(1)(b) Penalty Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Balasaheb Bhagwat Horane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Balasaheb Bhagwat Horane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
From ‘One-Day Notice’ to ‘Second Chance’ – Penalty rushed in a day, justice restored in a paragraph– ITAT Pune remands 271(1)(b) case
Assessee, an individual from Pandharpur, was levied penalty of ₹30,000 u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) dated 29.09.2020, 01.02.2021 & 22.02.2021 during assessment. AO held that Assessee failed to respond to these notices & accordingly imposed penalty.
On appeal, the case took an interesting procedural turn. The appeal before NFAC (CIT(A)) was filed electronically i...






