Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamal Vs Authorised Officer (DRAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamal Vs Authorised Officer (DRAT Chennai) DRAT Chennai held that rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 empowers forfeiture of earnest money deposit when balance sale consideration is not paid within stipulated time. Accordingly, order confirmed and appeal is dismissed. Facts- The appeal was filed against the sale held in respect of schedule mentioned property, on 29.05.2018. It is the case of the Appellant that Respondent No. 2 is the Partnership Firm, in which Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the partners. He mortgaged the schedule property for the loan availed by the 2nd Respo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930