Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chundayil Kalam Girijadevi (Deceased) Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chundayil Kalam Girijadevi (Deceased) Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Cochin ITAT Deletes Penalty – Higher Gratuity Exemption Claim Not Misreporting- Bona Fide Claim Cannot Attract 270A Penalty -Mere Wrong Claim Not Misreporting Assessee, a retired employee of Kerala State Finance Corporation, filed return on 06.08.2018 claiming exemption of ₹10 lakhs u/s 10(10) in respect of gratuity received on retirement. Subsequently, a revised return was filed enhancing claim of exemption to ₹20 lakhs relying on Notification S.O.1420(E) dated 29.03.2018. AO held that enhanced exemption limit was applicable onl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031