Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gajanand Financial Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Central) (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013–14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gajanand Financial Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Central) (ITAT Nagpur) Protective vs Substantive-  Nagpur ITAT Quashes PCIT’s 263 Order – Protective Addition Cannot Be Re-engineered- Detailed Enquiry by AO Saves Assessment – Tribunal Rejects 263 Revision Assessee filed appeal against the order of PCIT (Central) dated 05.03.2024 passed u/s 263 whereby assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was held erroneous & prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Assessee had originally filed return declaring a loss of ₹4,250. Pursuant to search in Tapadiya Group on 16.01.2019, AO reopened th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930