Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ultra Corpotech P L Employee Group Gratuity Cum Life Assurance Scheme Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ultra Corpotech P L Employee Group Gratuity Cum Life Assurance Scheme Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Mistaken Claim u/s 10(23AAA) Instead of 10(25)(iv) – ITAT Restores Matter for Verification- Approved Gratuity Trust Entitled to Exemption – Technical Error in Return Not Fatal Assessee, a Group Gratuity Trust approved by CIT on 20.09.2013 & later renewed by PCIT (Central), Pune on 14.10.2022 effective from 23.03.2022, had filed return claiming exemption of Rs. 6,51,82,342/-. However, in the return, exemption was mistakenly claimed u/s 10(23AAA) instead of u/s 10(25)(iv). CPC, in intimation u/s 143...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930