Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Debasis Das Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) No Straight Reliance on Stamp Value – DVO Valuation Must Precede 56(2)(x) Addition-Tribunal Protects Assessee from Mechanical Addition Based on Stamp Duty Value Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs. 19.98 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noted that Assessee along with his wife, Smt. Nineesha Das, had purchased a plot for Rs. 79.92 lakh while the stamp duty value was Rs. 1.39 crore. Assessee’s 3/4th share of the differential amount of Rs. 59.94 lakh was worked out at Rs. 44.95 lakh, which AO added as income from other sources u/s 56(2)(x). The CIT(A)/N...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930