Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Udit Goyal Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Udit Goyal Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Carry Forward of Capital Loss: 12-Day Delay in ITR Filing During COVID Deserves Liberal View-Delhi HC Remands Case Genuine Hardship Can’t Be Ignored – Technicalities Can’t Defeat Justice- Pandemic Hardship Valid Ground for Delay Delhi High Court considered a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application u/s 119(2)(b). The petitioner had filed his ITR for AY 2021–22 belatedly on 12.01.2022, i.e., with a delay of 12 days, claiming carry forward of long-term capital loss of ₹41.85 lakh from securities transactions. PCIT rejected his cond...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930