Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashok Nariyani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Page ContentsAshok Nariyani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Ashok Nariyani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Statement During Survey Alone Can’t Justify u/s 68 Addition- ITAT Jaipur Deletes Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Assessee, proprietor of Manisha Agencies, engaged in wholesale & retail trading of tobacco & mouth fresheners, filed return declaring income of ₹24.46 lakh. During demonetisation (09.11.2016–30.12.2016), Assessee deposited ₹5.00 crore in bank accounts. AO noted abnormal spike in November 2016 deposits & conducted survey u/s 133A. In survey statement, Assessee admitted ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031