Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Jindal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinod Jindal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Revenue’s Rubber Stamp Costs Dear – ITAT Deletes Additions & Penalty – Separate 153D Approval Needed for Each AY – ITAT Restores Rule of Law  Background A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 6 June 2018 on the SRS Group and its associates, including Mr. Vinod Jindal. Pursuant to the search, notices under Section 153A were issued for Assessment Years (AYs) 2013–14 to 2018–19. Mr. Jindal filed returns, but the Assessing Officer (AO) made additions under Section 68 (unexplained credits) ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930