Ekvira Hotels Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Unsigned, Wrong Year & Dead Company – ITAT Mumbai Quashes Reassessment & Deletes ₹1.12 Cr. Addition; Assessment on Struck-Off Company Void; Unsigned Order Non-Est in Law
Background
- Assessee company (engaged in hotel business since 1997) was struck off by RoC on 23.06.2017 under s.248(5) of Companies Act.
- Based on AIR info that assessee sold immovable property worth ₹1.12 Cr., AO reopened assessment u/s 148 on 27.03.2018.
- Notices returned unserved, no compliance. AO passed ex-parte reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, taxing entire ₹1.12 Cr. as undisclosed income.
- CIT(A)-NFAC also sustained addition, again ex-parte.
Assessee’s Contentions before ITAT
Reassessment void since:
- Initiated against a non-existent entity (company dissolved in 2017).
- Assessment order & demand notice unsigned and undated → legally non est.
- Transaction pertained to FY 2010-11 (sale deed 21.01.2011) → taxable, if at all, in AY 2011-12, not AY 2012-13.
Tribunal’s Findings
Unsigned Order:
- AO’s order & demand notice lacked any physical/digital signature.
- Without authentication, order is only a draft, void ab initio.
Non-Existent Company:
- Notice u/s 148 dated 27.03.2018 was issued after company’s dissolution.
- Assessment on a dead entity is a jurisdictional defect, incurable even under s.292B.
Wrong Assessment Year:
- Sale deed executed & consideration received in Jan 2011.
- Capital gains, if taxable, belonged to AY 2011-12, not AY 2012-13.
Decision
- ITAT held reassessment order incurably void due to all three defects.
- Entire proceedings quashed; addition of ₹1.12 Cr. deleted.
- Appeal allowed in favour of Assessee.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI
Paid content
Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.




