Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abhishek Shukla Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abhishek Shukla Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur) No Guesswork in Tax: When Bank Confirms Loan & Agri Income, Section 68 Addition Can’t Survive: ITAT Raipur Background Assessee, salaried employee, also engaged in agriculture. AO’s finding: During demonetisation, assessee deposited ₹26,97,000 in cash in HDFC & Dena Bank. AO alleged unexplained cash deposits & made addition u/s 68 of ₹23,82,220. Assessee’s explanation: Cash was from withdrawal of ₹24.40 lakh from KCC loan (April 2016), not utilized, hence redeposited during demonetisation, along with agricultural income. Dena Bankâ€...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930