Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Chennai Quashes Reassessment: Section 148 Notice by JAO After 29.03.22 Invalid

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 7959
Case Name
Chinnappan Peter Francis Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement


Chinnappan Peter Francis Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai)

148 Notice by JAO After 29.03.22 Invalid-  ITAT Chennai Quashes Reassessment – Notice u/s 148 Issued by Jurisdictional AO Instead of Faceless Unit Invalid

148 Notice by JAO After 29.03.22 Invalid-  ITAT Chennai Quashes Reassessment – Notice u/s 148 Issued by Jurisdictional AO Instead of Faceless Unit Invalid Assessee, a priest administering the Diocese & correspondent of a primary school, had deposited ₹55.78 lakh cash in South Indian Bank. Not having filed ROI u/s 139(1), he was issued notice u/s 148 on 07.04.2022 by ITO, Ward-1, Thanjavur. AO completed reassessment adding ₹28.53 lakh as unexplained cash deposits. CIT(A) NFAC upheld the addition

Assessee’s Argument

  • Cited CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022 mandating that all reassessment notices u/s 148 must be issued only through Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO).
  • Notice issued by Jurisdictional AO (JAO) post 29.03.2022 was invalid.
  • Relied on Madras HC ruling in TVS Credit Services Ltd. vs. DCIT (24.06.2025) following Hexaware Technologies Ltd. (Bom HC), holding JAO-issued notices bad in law

Tribunal’s Observations

  • CBDT Notification of 29.03.2022 introduced E-Assessment of Income Scheme, 2022 under s.151A, mandating faceless issuance of s.148 notices.
  • In this case, both notice u/s 148 & order u/s 148A(d), dated 07.04.2022, were issued by JAO, not NFAC → contrary to law.
  • Relied on rulings of Telangana HC (Kankanala Ravindra Reddy, Ta Infra Projects), Bombay HC (Hexaware Technologies), P&H HC (Jatinder Singh Bhangu), Gauhati HC (Ram Narayan Sah).
  • Supreme Court in Deepanjan Roy SLP (2025) dismissed Revenue’s challenge, upholding HC view.
  • Following Madras HC (TVS Credit Services Ltd.) & coordinate bench in Loganathan Dhandapani vs. ACIT (14.08.2025), Tribunal held notice invalid

Tribunal’s Decision

  • Notice u/s 148 & all consequential reassessment orders quashed.
  • Assessment order dated 30.01.2024 declared null & void.
  • Revenue’s right kept open if SC reverses Hexaware ruling in future.
  • Appeal allowed in full

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT CHENNAI

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,104

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.