Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Juzer Saifuddin Boriyawala Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Juzer Saifuddin Boriyawala Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) NRI Never Served Notice – ITAT Mumbai Restores Case on Validity of Reopening; CIT(A) Erred in Treating Jurisdictional Grounds as General – Tribunal Remands Matter; ITAT Mumbai Restores NRI’s Case – Validity of Reopening Without Service of Notice u/s 148 to be Re-Examined An NRI based in Sharjah (UAE), appealed against the order of CIT(A arising from reassessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 147. AO reopened case u/s 148 alleging unexplained cash deposits of ₹35.34 lakh in Lunawada Peoples Co-op Bank & ₹27.85 lakh unexplained investment i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031