Sanghvi Metal Corporation Vs Union of India & Ors (Gujarat High Court)
Gujarat High Court permitted the petitioner to rectify Form GSTR-1 due to inadvertently showing the turnover of sister concern in Form GSTR-1 resulting into difference in outward supplies declared in Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR-3B.
Facts- The petitioner is a sole proprietorship concern engaged in the business of trading of iron and steel related goods and duly registered under the provisions of Central/ State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
The respondent No.4 issued a show-cause notice dated 29.9.2023 in Form GST DRC-01 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why tax amounting to Rs.40,32,390/- should not be demanded and recovered along with interest and penalty on the ground that there is a difference in the outward supplies declared in Form GSTR-01 and outward supplies as per Form GSTR-3B.
The respondent No.5, passed an order-in-original dated 20.12.2023 in Form GST DRC-07 determining tax demand of Rs.40,27,272/- along with interest of Rs.44,70,272/- and interest on penalty. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation. Being aggrieved, the present writ is filed.
Conclusion- Held that the petitioner has inadvertently shown the turnover of sister concern in the Form GSTR-1 filed for the third quarter of the Financial Year 2017-18 and, therefore, such mistake is required to be rectified. The petition, therefore, succeeds and is accordingly allowed. The impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in GST APL-04 issued by the respondent no. 5 is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is permitted to file rectified Form GSTR-1 within a period of four weeks from today, which shall be accepted by the respondent manually and processed accordingly, in accordance with law.
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.






