Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Savitrivasudeva Govinda Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Savitrivasudeva Govinda Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Past Withdrawals Valid Source- Demonetisation Deposits Explained – ITAT Deletes 69A Addition for Retired 82-Year LIC Officer Bangalore ITAT dealt with addition made on account of demonetisation cash deposits. Assessee, a retired LIC employee aged 82 years, had deposited ₹15.30 lakh in his savings account during November 2016. AO treated these deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A after accepting only part of his explanation, while CIT(A) upheld the addition on the assumption that withdrawals were made over several years since 2011, which ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031