Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkatraman Jayashree Priyadharshini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Venkatraman Jayashree Priyadharshini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Assessee, an individual, declared LTCG of ₹1.37 crore on sale of property & claimed deduction u/s 54. AO, however, computed LTCG at ₹2.87 crore, disallowing large part of claimed exemption. CIT(A) granted partial relief, restricting taxable LTCG to ₹2.01 crore, allowing cost of new flat at ₹88.85 lakh. Before Tribunal, Assessee contended that further costs incurred on making the new residential property habitable-such as interior works (wardrobes, modular kitchen, cupboards, painting, fittings, etc.) of ₹21 lakh supporte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930