Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Taran Pal Wadhwan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Taran Pal Wadhwan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Composite & mechanical approval u/s 153D invalidates assessments framed u/s 153C- Approval must be specific to each year & cannot be a perfunctory exercise These two appeals were filed against order of CIT(A) arising from assessments framed u/s 153C r.w.s. 144 for AYs 2018-19 & 2019-20. The primary ground raised by Assessee was the validity of approval obtained u/s 153D before completing assessments. Assessee contended that AO had merely forwarded draft assessment orders to Additional CIT while seeking approval u/s 153D & no case records o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930