Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Kshetra Bhimashankar Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Kshetra Bhimashankar Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit (ITAT Pune) Cash Deposits Representing Members’ Daily Savings – ITAT Pune Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69A Assessee, a cooperative credit society, had not filed return for AY 2018-19. AO, based on Insight portal info, noticed cash deposits of ₹1,00,43,800/- & withdrawals of ₹6,05,000/-. Since there was no compliance, AO framed ex parte assessment u/s 144 & assessed income at ₹1,06,48,800/- by treating deposits & withdrawals as unexplained money u/s 69A. Before CIT(A), Assessee explained that d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031