Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandesh Liladhar Chaudhari Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandesh Liladhar Chaudhari Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Notice u/s 148 Issued After 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 Held Invalid – ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment AO had issued notice u/s 148A(b) & order u/s 148A(d) on 26.07.2022, alleging cash deposit of ₹1.01 crore in Renukamata Multistate Urban Co-op Society. Assessee objected that details were mismatched, deposits were only ₹2.54 lakh, return was already filed & CBDT instructions did not permit reopening below ₹50 lakh. Tribunal referred to Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (469 ITR 46, SC) where Revenue conceded that for AY 2015-16 all notic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031