Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sachin Malpani and Ors. Vs Nilam Patil and Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sachin Malpani and Ors. Vs Nilam Patil and Ors. (Bombay High Court) In a ruling with implications for apartment ownership and maintenance charges, the Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition by residents of Pune’s ‘Treasure Park’ condominium, upholding a lower court’s decision that maintenance fees must be charged based on the proportionate size and value of an apartment. The decision, handed down in the case of Sachin Malpani and Ors. vs. Nilam Patil and Ors., settles a long-standing dispute over whether all apartment owners in a condominium, regardless of flat size...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Ajay Kasera says:

    there should also be strict rules in place that can be used to tackle non payment of maintenance and still enjoying benefits at the cost of others

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930