Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

ED Must Share ECIR Number & Predicate Offence in Summons: Calcutta HC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 5913
Case Name
Praveen Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Praveen Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Calcutta High Court, in the case of Praveen Kumar vs. Union of India & Ors., has issued a directive to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to issue fresh summons to the petitioner, Praveen Kumar, under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The court emphasized that these fresh summons should ideally include the ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) number and details of the predicate offence that led to the registration of the ECIR and the subsequent search and seizure. This ruling comes after a writ petition was filed by Praveen Kumar challenging an ED search authorization and seeking the return of seized cash.

Background of the Case:

Praveen Kumar approached the Calcutta High Court challenging a search authorization dated June 11, 2025. The petitioner contended that the search and seizure operation conducted by the ED was illegal because it took place at an address not specified in the search authorization. Furthermore, Kumar claimed he was not informed of the predicate offence for which the ED’s investigation was being carried out. He sought the return of Rs. 9,00,000/- in seized cash and a directive against any coercive action by the ED.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,000

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.