This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Upholds Section 69A Addition for Depositing Demonetized Notes
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Raju Ravichandran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Raju Ravichandran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
In the case of Raju Ravichandran vs ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, upheld the assessment order treating cash deposits of ₹16.20 lakh made during the demonetization period as unexplained income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in egg trading under the name ‘Arav Tradings’, had deposited specified bank notes (SBNs) of ₹500 and ₹1000 denominations between 09.11.2016 and 31.12.2016, claiming these were sales proceeds. The Assessing Officer held that post-demonetization, such notes ceased ...
