This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged Without Concrete Evidence: CESTAT Kolkata
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
The case of Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise revolved around allegations of clandestine removal and underpayment of excise duty based on estimated production norms. The Department contended that the appellant, a manufacturer of sponge iron, had understated production by 11,542 MT during 2008-09 and 2009-10, based on an input/output ratio of 1:1.67. This theoretical norm suggested higher production than recorded, leading to a demand for unpaid duty of ₹1.59 c...
