Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gold Palace Jewellers Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gold Palace Jewellers Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ₹2.44 crore cash deposit addition confirmed by CIT(A)without proper opportunity: ITAT Orders Fresh Adjudication In the case of Gold Palace Jewellers Vs ACIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore addressed an appeal filed by the assessee, a partnership firm engaged in gold and diamond jewelry trading. The case revolved around unexplained cash deposits of ₹2.44 crore during the demonetization period, which the Assessing Officer (AO) had taxed under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. Dissatisfied with the AO’s assessment, the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930