This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Writ Jurisdiction on Section 148A(d) Orders Requires Exhaustion of Remedies
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Laxminarayan Patidar Vs ITO (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madhya Pradesh HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Laxminarayan Patidar Vs ITO (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Laxminarayan Patidar challenging an order under Section 148A(d) and a subsequent notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to the reopening of assessment for AY 2018-19. The petitioner argued that the order and notice were arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and in violation of natural justice, as no proper opportunity for a hearing was given. Additionally, it was contended that the Assessing Officer failed to consider the petitioner’s response before passing ...
