This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Requirement to explain ‘source of source’ was restricted to Share Capital and couldn’t be extended to unsecured Loans
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Vastimal Bhim Raj Sancheti (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Vastimal Bhim Raj Sancheti (ITAT Bangalore)
Conclusion: Assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of credits in his books and consequently, CIT(A) had rightly deleted the additions after relying on various judgments made by AO. The obligation to explain the “source of source” under Section 68 was restricted to credits like share capital and did not extend to unsecured loans received.
Held: Assessee, had received unsecured loans amounting to Rs. 5.87 crore and Rs. 8.31 crore from Magnificent Realcon Pvt. Ltd. (MRPL) during the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016...
Author Info
