This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Exercising Joint Option Under EPF Scheme Precedes Higher Pension Option Under EPS 1995
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sudhir Kumar Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Patna High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sudhir Kumar Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
Exercising joint option under Paragraph 26(6) of the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 is a precursor to exercise option under Paragraph 11(3) of the Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 for higher pension.
The Patna High Court, in the case of Sudhir Kumar Vs Union of India, addressed a petition filed by retired employees of the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. seeking higher pensionable salaries under the Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 (EPS). The petitioners, after contributing excess amounts to the ...
Author Info
EPFO EPS 95 Higher pension online exercise for new retirees or new applicants paragraph 26(6) & Para 11(3) to be submitted EPFO portal; now it is possible for central government PSU repaired employee