This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Relinquishment of security interest on non-payment of Liquidation Costs as per 21A(3) of Liquidation Regulations
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Vs Varsha Bagri (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Vs Varsha Bagri (NCLAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Where secured creditor failed to pay the liquidation costs within 90 days after its intention to realize the security interest, the security interest should stand relinquished under Regulation 21A(3) of the Liquidation Regulations, 2016.
Held: Appellant sought to realise its security interest under the SARFAESI Act in the liquidation process of the corporate debtor but the possession of the assets was denied by the liquidator despite an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority by which the possessio...






