This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cash withdrawals satisfactorily explained through documents cannot be added u/s. 69A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajendra Gadhia Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rajendra Gadhia Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 69A of the Income Tax Act reduced with the amount of cash withdrawals which is satisfactorily explained through documents. Held that once cash withdrawals are demonstrated, the burden shifts to the Department to disprove their availability for subsequent deposits.
Facts- The assessee is an NRI. During the demonetization period, the assessee made cash deposits of Rs.6,00,000/- each in his bank account. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the AO questioned the source of these cash deposits. The assessee explained ...
Author Info
