This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Assessee having center of vital interest in India is treated as resident of India: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ashok Kumar Pandey Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ashok Kumar Pandey Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that as per article 4(2)(a) of Indo-US DTAA, an individual is resident of state in which he has center of vital interest being where his personal and economical relations are closer. Accordingly, assessee treated as resident of India as has personal and economic relationship more close in India.
Facts- For the year under consideration, assessee has claimed that assessee is resident in India as well as in United States of America. Thus, the residential status of the assessee is required to be determined in accordance wit...


