This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Sec 41(1) Addition for Non-Response from Creditors if Payments Made Later
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Saket Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Saket Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
In the case of Saket Agarwal vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Jaipur deliberated on the Rs. 3.17 crore addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of unproved creditors. This case provides an insightful example of the application of Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, particularly in the context of trade liabilities and the conditions under which such liabilities are treated as income.
Case Background
Saket Agarwal, the proprietor of M/s. Saket Gems, was involved in the business of trading precious and s...
